Lipstick on a Pig

So the government has sweetened the Gauteng e-Toll deal. Cyril got the delicious job of being the front man for this ongoing trainsmash. (I get a feeling Zuma is going to throw more and more crap Cyril's way to see just how low he will sink to satisfy his political ambitions.)

Without going into pedantic detail here is my understanding of how it worked prior to Cyril's recent statement  ...

• You get billed somewhere around 60 cents for every kilometre of GFIP e-Toll road you travel. If you pay promptly you get a discount so that you pay somewhere around 30 cents per kilometre.

• In the brave new world of the new e-Toll dispensation you get charged 30 cents for every kilometre of GFIP e-Toll road you travel. If you don't pay promptly the rate is increased to 60 cents a kilometre.

• The maximum that a small segment of e-Toll road users will be charged is reduced from R450 per month to R225 per month.

• And if you don't pay promptly that maximum becomes ... you guessed it ... R450, the old maximum.

To the best of my understanding I can see no material difference between these two. They both seem to be structured like this: If you pay promtly you pay 30 cents per kilometre  and if you don't pay promptly you pay 60 cents per kilometre. Granted if you're a goody two shoes you get away with a lower monthly maximum.

I'm guessing that the management cost, that mysterious secret amount that the public shall not be told, remains a constant. If so, then the collection mechanism becomes even more inefficient as the management cost becomes a higher proportion of the total amount collected.

Then comes the bullying. If you don't pay then you will not be allowed to renew your vehicle license.

I sense that as the ANC trots deeper and deeper into the realms of the indefensible we will see more and more similar bullying tactics.

The whole GFIP e-Toll disaster reflects how the ANC has no concept or interest in the concept of governing for the good of the people. Government is supposed to be there for good of the people of the country, or in a reasonably adequate world they should be. The ANC is progressively less and less in government for the good of the people and the rate of gouging the citizens has accelerated under Jacob Zuma's watch.

Cloud Cuckoo Land

The expression "Cloud Cuckoo Land" refers to an unrealistically idealistic state where everything is perfect. ("You're living in cloud cuckoo land.") It hints that the person referred to is naïve, unaware of reality or deranged in holding such an optimistic belief. (Wikipedia)

This picture shows page 1 and page 3 of the Business Day of 27 May 2015. Yesterday.

The article on page 1 is not attributed to any opposition political party, greedy privileged white owned industrialist, biased foreign ratings agency, or any other counter revolutionary. No, it is the national, statutory statistics bureau. Surely their job is to dig out the numbers that support the "good story".

The article on page 3 is clearly a pronouncement by our less than esteemed corruptor in chief. There is no doubt in my mind, in spite of the good that has been done in the last 21 years, that South Africa is more than troubled. It is my view that South Africa was troubled under Mbeki. I get a sense that Zuma has taken South Africa past a tipping point. I feel that he has wrought tremendous destruction to vital state institutions. I feel he has wrought tremendous destruction to what was good and worthwhile in the ANC so that it is impossible for any strongly principled member to climb to a position of authority or power within the party.

The definition above says "It hints that the person referred to is naïve, unaware of reality or deranged in holding such an optimistic belief."

You decide which of these you think fits Jacob Zuma.

Disclaimer Proclaimer

I write about whatever I feel like in this blog. There is no theme that I am obliged to follow.

Much, if not all, of what I write is about things that I see and hear in the world around me together with the inside workings that make me who I am.

There is seldom, if ever, any serious, conscious science or research behind what I say. Rather I try and express the gestalt I get from the world around me.

I'd like to think that there could be something of value lurking somewhere in most of what I write. 

How Serious is the ANC About Government for the Good of the People?

This question surely underlies so many discussions and criticisms regarding the ANC's tenure as South Africa's ruling party and government.

Surely if the ANC was serious about government for the good of the people then a lot of things would be a lot better. For example, our education department would be serving our children by ensuring our tax money was put to good use and that good governance principles, checks and balances and accountability would permeate the department. Clearly this is not the case.

The protracted chaotic state of affairs in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality is further evidence that the ANC is not really concerned with government for the good of the people. It is only now that the ANC looks to be at risk of losing the municipality to the DA in the forthcoming local government elections that the central ANC has intervened. It actually looks as though the ANC, in it's arrogance, wasn't even prepared to make any intervention in the light of the parlous state of the municipality. 

That is until the DA students union won the Fort Hare SRC election. After all that has gone wrong this finally seems to have caught the attention of the ANC NEC knobs.

They decided they needed to get seriously serious about doing something serious.

So what do they do? To show how seriously serious they are about sorting the serious problems down there.

They put in a part-time mayor.

With all the kak that is going on and how seriously bad they suddenly realise things are they put in a frigging part-time mayor to solve everything!

Danny Jordaan is president of SAFA. He assures us that his responsibilities at SAFA won't interfere with his ability to resolve the pressing issues in Nelson Mandela Bay. Maybe that helps us understand why SAFA is such a stuff up. Clearly Danny's view is that his responsibilities at SAFA are so lightweight that he can successfully moonlight as mayor of one of our biggest and most troubled municipalities.

I would have thought that if the new mayor of the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality was serious about his responsibility to resolve the pressing issues he would be expecting twelve to sixteen hour days dedicated to Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality for a protracted period of time.

Naaaaah, says Danny. Naaaaah, says the ANC.

Good governance for the good of the people?

Naaaaah, says the ANC.